Thank you for reading
Posted on | November 24, 2009 | 5 Comments
Chance of Rain will begin posting again with “The week that was” on Sunday, November 29th.
Category: Uncategorized
Comments
5 Responses to “Thank you for reading”
Leave a Reply
About the West
About Water
- Aquafornia: Newsfeed of the Water Education Foundation
- California Reservoirs
- Climate Change
- Downstream: Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting
- Lake Mead Elevations
- Reddit Water
- The Pacific Institute
- UC Berkeley's "On Water"
- Water Education Foundation
- Water Websites A to W: Acequias, Adjudication, Aguanomics to Wisdom in water, please…
- Western Water Links
- World water news: WaterWired
American Red Cross
Conservation
Find Your Forecast
Kitchen Gardens
View Journalism Archives
Contact
Emily Green by e-mail at emily.green [at] mac.comMeta
Registration
E-mail emily.green [@] mac.com to subscribe to this blog.
-
TALK ON WATER: BLOG
- The week that was, 8/29-9/4/2010
- High good, low bad: Mead in August 2010
- The Dry Garden: Dig it
- In praise of Mark Gold
- Sherman’s “little friend”
- Let them eat plastic
- Maps help
- September fully loaded
- The week that was, 8/22-28/2010
- The Dry Garden: Pruning sage
- Four scenarios for climate change and water
- Betting man seeks angles
- The city flower
- Heat wave
- The week that was, 8/15-21/2010
Comments
Blog
Categories
Subscription Options:




November 24th, 2009 @ 7:33 am
80% of the water in California is used by farmers for agriculture.
Why is it that only the cities and individuals are asked to conserve?
Aren’t there better methods of irrigation that farms can use?
November 24th, 2009 @ 7:42 am
Hi John, good point helped all the more by being true. It’s not just cities being asked to conserve, though there are many good arguments to be made that farms should conserve more than cities. The problem is that, regardless of the waste by agriculture, we in cities also waste roughly a quarter of our water supply on landscaping alone. This has many harmful impacts — low reservoirs concentrate pollutants and leave us without emergency reserves. The run-off from cities is killing the Pacific. West Nile is a 100% elective seasonal killer that breeds in sprinkler run-off. It’s in our best interest to conserve, and nothing about our doing the right thing gives agriculture a pass for doing the wrong one. I hope that helps. Thanks for writing.
November 24th, 2009 @ 8:40 am
Another factor is that most of the water agriculture uses is returned to streams and rivers or is absorbed by groundwater aquifers. By focusing on the volume of water agriculture uses we fail to address the quality of the water that is returned to the environment. Additionally, wIth less water in the system overall, California farmers are beginning to see higher salt levels in soil from the use of low-pressure conservation devices such as drip irrigation, leading to lower crop yields (and higher food prices eventually)… And like Emily wrote, even if cities took that water, what would we do with it other than create more problems for ourselves?
Adan Ortega
November 24th, 2009 @ 11:21 pm
And thank YOU for writing!
November 26th, 2009 @ 10:58 am
[...] Emily Green: Thank You for Reading [...]