<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chance of Rain &#187; Las Vegas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chanceofrain.com/tag/las-vegas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chanceofrain.com</link>
	<description>Water, Politics, Environment, Gardening</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 01:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>High good, low bad: Mead in July 2011</title>
		<link>http://chanceofrain.com/2011/08/high-good-low-bad-mead-in-july-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://chanceofrain.com/2011/08/high-good-low-bad-mead-in-july-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmilyGreen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chance of rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Mead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Bureau of Reclamation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chanceofrain.com/?p=17418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Why, you might wonder, would anyone in their right mind use a map highlighting the <a href="http://www.mvd.usace.army.mil/Offices/pa/brochures/Facts%20&#38;%20Figures%20WEB.pdf" target="_blank">Mississippi River system</a> for a monthly post about the elevation of the largest reservoir on the Colorado River?  The reason is a renewed offer on the table from Las Vegas water manager Pat Mulroy. Divert the Mississippi and its tributaries to feed upper basin Colorado River users, give Vegas the water therefore left in the Colorado River system and she&#8217;ll leave the Great Basin aquifer alone. “The instate project wouldn’t be needed because at that point what you’ve done is securitize the Colorado River,&#8221; she tells a reporter for &#8220;<a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/aug/01/troubled-waters/" target="_blank">Vegas, Inc</a>.&#8221; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">This transcontinental flood control scheme isn&#8217;t new. Pat&#8217;s been braving ribald mockery over it for at least three years now. The &#8220;give me more Colorado River water or the Great Basin desert gets it&#8221; line isn&#8217;t new either &#8212;</span>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chanceofrain.com/2011/08/high-good-low-bad-mead-in-july-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High good, low bad: Mead in February 2011</title>
		<link>http://chanceofrain.com/2011/03/high-good-low-bad-mead-in-february-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://chanceofrain.com/2011/03/high-good-low-bad-mead-in-february-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 04:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmilyGreen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chance of rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Mead elevations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chanceofrain.com/?p=16575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160;</p>
<div id="attachment_16576" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://chanceofrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/0007bC.jpeg"></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Actionful and remarkably well-groomed bureaucrats: Bureau of Land Management illustration explaining what might appear a Southern Nevada Water Authority-friendly bent in the framing of the pending Environmental Impact Statement. Click on the image to read the captions.</p></div>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Two decades ago, a plan to tap the Great Basin Aquifer in five Nevada valleys through a nearly 300-mile-long pipeline to slake inexorably booming Las Vegas was a back-up plan. Plan A was that Nevada&#8217;s relatively small allocation from the Colorado River could be increased. Las Vegas is, after all, twenty miles from Lake Mead, the largest storage reservoir in the U.S.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Yet when Western cities kept booming after the Colorado River entered long-term drought in 1991, Plan B became Plan A. Tapping the aquifer of the glorious and sparsely populated counties of Nevada&#8217;s Great Basin Desert became a central pillar of the <a href="http://www.snwa.com/html/" target="_blank">Southern Nevada</a></span>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chanceofrain.com/2011/03/high-good-low-bad-mead-in-february-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vegas pipeline hearing timeline sketched</title>
		<link>http://chanceofrain.com/2010/08/vegas-pipeline-hearing-timeline-sketched/</link>
		<comments>http://chanceofrain.com/2010/08/vegas-pipeline-hearing-timeline-sketched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmilyGreen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Nevada Water Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Engineer of Nevada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chanceofrain.com/?p=14807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://chanceofrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/gw_map_400.jpg"></a><span style="font-size: small;">FOLLOWING a series of damning court decisions that vacated almost 80,000 acre feet a year of groundwater awards to Las Vegas from four valleys in rural Nevada, the State Engineer has published a tentative </span><a href="http://water.nv.gov/hearings/waterhearing/SpringDryCaveDelamar/Pre-notice%20website%20press%20release.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">schedule</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> to re-notice and re-hear the cases. If the brisk timeline is kept, the decisions over whether or not to tap the Great Basin Aquifer to slake Las Vegas could come as early as mid-February 2012.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Under the new schedule, notices of the applications by Las Vegas for permission to tap rural groundwater over thousands of square miles will be published in regional Nevadan newspapers in November. The period in which affected parties may lodge legal protests entitling them to participate in the hearings will close in late December.<br />
</span> <span id="more-14807"></span><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">The requirement to re-hear the cases stemming from 1989 applications by Las Vegas comes at a time that Nevada is in an</span>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chanceofrain.com/2010/08/vegas-pipeline-hearing-timeline-sketched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Virtually impossible&#8221; for monitoring safeguards to work</title>
		<link>http://chanceofrain.com/2010/01/virtually-impossible-for-monitoring-safeguards-to-work/</link>
		<comments>http://chanceofrain.com/2010/01/virtually-impossible-for-monitoring-safeguards-to-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 04:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmilyGreen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chance of rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Bredehoeft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salt Lake Tribune]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chanceofrain.com/?p=10893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://chanceofrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Figure1-to-EMM.jpg"></a><span style="font-size: small;">WILL the monitoring of the groundwater pumping proposed by Las Vegas in the Great Basin safeguard the targeted valleys? &#8220;It is virtually impossible,&#8221; writes 32-year veteran of the US Geological Survey John D. Bredehoeft in the <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_14202904" target="_blank">Salt Lake Tribune</a>. To read the op-ed piece by the country&#8217;s presiding authority on groundwater, click </span><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_14202904" target="_blank">here</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Or for a longer version of the article supplied by Dr Bredehoeft, click </span><a href="http://chanceofrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/GROUNDWATER-MONITORINGFOR-MITIGATION_-WILL-IT-WORK.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">here.</span></a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chanceofrain.com/2010/01/virtually-impossible-for-monitoring-safeguards-to-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Item 5</title>
		<link>http://chanceofrain.com/2009/11/item-5/</link>
		<comments>http://chanceofrain.com/2009/11/item-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EmilyGreen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chance of rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emily Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Nevada Water Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chanceofrain.com/?p=9298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://chanceofrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/getimage.exe2.jpeg"></a><a href="http://www.snwa.com/cfml/agenda/public_meeting.cfm?reason=detail_search_results&#38;id=11662&#38;agenda_org_id=1&#38;doc_id=11662" target="_blank"></a></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;"><strong>Updated 11/19/2009 9.21am PST</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.snwa.com/cfml/agenda/public_meeting.cfm?reason=detail_search_results&#38;id=11662&#38;agenda_org_id=1&#38;doc_id=11662" target="_blank">ITEM 5 </a></span><span style="font-size: small;">on the agenda for this Thursday&#8217;s board meeting of the </span><a href="http://www.snwa.com/html/" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">Southern Nevada Water Authority</span></a><span style="font-size: small;"> calls for the directors to take an </span><a href="http://chanceofrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/10-19-09-CDD-Robison-Order.PDF" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: small;">October 15, 2009 decision </span></a><span style="font-size: small;">by a Nevada district judge Norman C. Robison to the state Supreme Court.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">The Robison decision deemed a 2008 award of water to Las Vegas and the SNWA by the State Engineer of Nevada from three Lincoln County valleys  &#8221;arbitrary, oppressive and a manifest abuse of discretion.&#8221; It then vacated the award for water in the three valleys that are the key first staging grounds of a nearly 300-mile-long pipeline that Las Vegas plans to run into the heart of the state to pump rural groundwater.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Why did the judge rule the way he did? According to Robison, the water &#8212; 18,755 acre feet of it a year (or enough for 37,000 homes) &#8212; isn&#8217;t there. &#8220;The state</span>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://chanceofrain.com/2009/11/item-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: chanceofrain.com @ 2012-02-04 03:01:00 -->
