July dry gardening events

Posted on | July 2, 2009 | No Comments

WE CAN change the world … by treating it sensibly and artfully. What’s more, for Western gardeners, it’s fun. Click here for a full calendar of dry gardening events around Southern California. If you like the look of the Epilobium californica pictured below and blooming now in native gardens across the region with scarcely a drop of water, don’t miss Lili Singer’s “Look Ma, no lawn!” courses for the Theodore Payne Foundation. 

Epilobium californica, flowering now. Photo: Native Sons

Epilobium californica. Photo: Native Sons. Click on photo for link to Native Sons nursery

speakers-lili-singer

Lili Singer of the Theodore Payne Foundation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


High good, low bad: Mead in June

Posted on | July 1, 2009 | 1 Comment

aster_colorado_delta

NASA image of the Colorado River Delta in the Gulf of California. Click on image for NASA history of the image and the region.

LAKE MEAD is the Colorado River reservoir holding key water supplies for California, Arizona, Nevada and the Republic of Mexico. The remnants of what was once a vast watershed concluding in the Gulf of California now depend on releases of water from Mead.

Yet will there be water to release? The level of the lake has dropped nearly 32 feet in the last six years. If it drops another 20, and the elevation is at or below 1,075 on January 1st,  Mexico, Arizona and Nevada will face punishing cuts in their allocations. Essential preserves for wildlife will be subject to ever more desperate schemes promoted by the driest states, including “non-water solutions” for fish habitat.* The Southern Nevada Water Authority has given the 1,075 elevation as the trigger for start of construction for a pipeline into the Great Basin, a vast groundwater pumping project to serve Las Vegas, which will turn the stunningly beautiful heartland into the West into a wasteland.

California farmers and urban consumers will be temporarily immune from the hell unleashed on Nevada, Arizona and Mexico by the 1,075 elevation. They are immune to cuts in Lake Mead allocations because of the historical seniority of their claims on the water and some artful lawyering in a long legal battle with Arizona.

Is it fair? No. Good management? Quite the opposite. Tragic? Beyond your wildest dreams. Legal? Yes.

The crisis is here now. The solution is some years away. America got to the Moon, launched the satellite that took the stunning picture (above) and elected its first black president before California has even begun to openly consider that it might have an unfair grasp on the Colorado River’s water (see Why the West hates Southern California). The only way to create the time for politics to catch up with nature is to conserve water. Now. Everyone can do it. It’s easy, it’s effective and it’s urgent. Beyond urgent.

              DATE                                           ELEVATION OF LAKE MEAD

June 30, 2009:                                          1,095.26

June 30, 2008:                                          1,104.98

June 30, 2007:                                          1,113.50

June 30, 2006:                                          1,128.26

June 30, 2005:                                          1,140.46

June 30, 2004:                                          1,126.93

For May elevations, click here. For April, here. For US Bureau of Reclamation records of Lake Mead elevations, click here. For the shortage sharing agreement between the Colorado River states, click here.

*See Center for Biological Diversity on the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program 

This post has been updated on June 2, 2009. A Las Vegas Eyewitness News link about struggling marina operators at Lake Mead posted 12 hours ago has been replaced by the NASA image and the text altered accordingly. The reason? TV has the boaters covered, and so do the scrambling, recreation-industry sponsored politicians discussed in the nightly news report. This blog is more interested in the long-term and environmental consequences of our water use patterns.


Officially dry

Posted on | June 30, 2009 | No Comments

ApricotsLOS ANGELES is poised today to record its fourth year in a row with below normal rainfall, reports the Los Angeles Times. From July 1 of last year to June 30—the period designated the “rain year”—only about 9 inches fell, compared with the average of just over 15 inches. 

For the full story, click here.

Polluters 5, Environmentalists 0: Supreme Court term reviewed

Posted on | June 29, 2009 | No Comments

FURTHER to last week’s 6-3 Supreme Court Decision in Coeur Alaska, Inc v. Southeast Alaska Conservation Council et al,  the Center for Law, Energy and the Environment (CLEE) at UC Berkeley will be holding a live Webcast Tuesday June 30, 10-11.30am Pacific Time discussing the environmental record of the concluding Supreme Court term.

Panelists include CLEE executive director Richard Frank and Berkeley professors Dan Farber and Holly Doremus, and assistant professor Eric Biber.

The cases under discussion will include Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council (environmental organizations’ challenge to the U.S. Navy’s active sonar testing program); Summers v. Earth Island Institute (environmental groups seeking to block the sale of timber from fire-damaged federal lands in California); Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper (environmentalists challenging the EPA’s use of cost-benefit analysis for power plant projects); Burlington Northern v. United States (federal government trying a case under Superfund law that would have made Shell Oil and Burlington Northern liable for cleaning up a hazardous waste site) and the Coeur Alaska case (environmentalists challenging the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit that allowed a mine operator to pump mining wastes into a pristine lake).

As CLEE notes in its press release, environmentalists lost every challenge. The agenda before the panel is to assess the impact of these recent rulings and the dissonance between the High Court and the Ninth Circuit,  analyze the Robert’s Court’s overall environmental law record to date, preview the Court’s upcoming Term, and consider the impact of a probable Sotomayor appointment.

Lake or dump? You decide

Posted on | June 29, 2009 | No Comments

 

Slate Lake in the Tongass National Forest. Photo: Sierra Club.

Slate Lake in the Tongass National Forest, Alaska. Photo: Sierra Club.

FOR THOSE wondering about whether there is recourse to the Supreme Court’s  Coeur Alaska ruling last Monday, there is.

The decision, which by a 6-3 vote upheld the legality of dumping gold mine waste into Lower Slate Lake in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, “can be undone in one of two ways,” said Ed Hopkins, Director of Sierra Club Environmental Quality Program. “One is the Obama administration could issue a rule-making and overturn a rule that the Bush administration did in 2002, which essentially created this problem. Or Congress can pass the the Clean Water Protection Act, which would also overturn the 2002 Bush administration rule.”

The Clean Water Protection Act would return the definition of “fill” to its original meaning (ie: not including pollutants), but it has been stymied in the past by advocates of mountain top removal mining in Appalachia. Last Thursday a Senate Subcommittee resumed hearings on the issue.  

To read a blistering New York Times editorial on the Supreme Court decision, click here. For a Sierra Club review, click here. Then, if you’re as mad as the author of the New York Times editorial is, write your congressional delegates and the White House. For a Sierra Club primer on how to do that, click here.

« go back — keep looking »
  • After the lawn


  • As you were saying: Comments

  • As I was saying: Recent posts

  • Garden blogs


  • Contact

    Emily Green by e-mail at emily.green [at] mac.com
  • Categories