Green Sturgeon New Smelt for Bay-Delta Pumps?
Posted on | May 22, 2009 | 3 Comments
A federal biologist holds a green sturgeon caught and released in San Pablo Bay, Calif., in 2002. Photo: NOAA
THE SAME day that Central Valley farmers filed suit over pumping stoppages to protect the Delta smelt, the spectre of additional protections for another fish, this time the green sturgeon, rose from government scientists. Reports Thursday May 21 from AP and Fresno Bee followed today (May 22) by a better report in Aquafornia.
For the full story, go to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announcement as to why its Fisheries Service “is seeking public comment on a proposed rule that generally prohibits acts that would kill or harm a distinct group of North American green sturgeon that spawn in the Sacramento River.
Listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, this distinct segment of green sturgeon is found from Alaska to California but is only known to reproduce or spawn in California’s Sacramento River. Data indicate a steady decline of juvenile green sturgeon over the last 30 years. The major cause of decline is likely the loss of spawning habitat in California’s Central Valley.
Today’s proposed rule prohibits the “take” (harassing, harming, pursuing, hunting, shooting, wounding, killing, trapping, capturing, or collecting the fish, or any attempt to engage in such conduct) of these listed fish, apart from certain categories of activities that contribute to conservation of the species such as some types of scientific research, habitat restoration, or emergency fish rescue operations.”
Also see May water news bulletins updated daily in Press from the West
Tags: chance of rain > Emily Green > endangered species > fish > State Water Project
In Defense of Salt Cedars
Posted on | May 20, 2009 | No Comments
Those gorgeous plants are bad, right? They’re the invasive riparian trees sucking Western water ways so dry that in 2006 Congress dedicated $80 million to study how to get rid of them.
Wrong.
Yes, millions have been spent trying to kill them, but it turns out that they may be good for the West.
WaterWired spotted the story in the May / June issue of Southwest Hydrology and today zapped it straight into the echo chamber. It turns out that the much vilified Salt Cedar, aka Tamarisk, does not gulp inordinate amounts of water. Moreover, it cohabits nicely with native vegetation except where native vegetation is stressed by human pressure on the rivers. Evidently, tamarisk is even a good habitat for birds.
To read the article by Edward P. Glenn of the University of Arizona and Pamela L. Nagler and Jeffrey E. Lovich of the US Geological Survey, click here and head for the “On the Ground” section.
Tags: chance of rain > Colorado River > Emily Green > invasive species > Salt Cedars
How To, Why To Save Water
Posted on | May 16, 2009 | No Comments
A Grace Phillips garden from www.gracescapes.com
By Grace Phillips
RECENTLY, the Metropolitan Water District reduced water allocations to Southern California by about 20%. While we in Santa Monica are cushioned, the City will probably ask for further voluntary 10% reductions. That raises the question: Can you afford to reduce your water use? I have come to realize that it is very difficult for Santa Monica water users to answer that, because when you get your water bill, you have no way of knowing whether you are a good, careful water user, or a major water waster.
So, I thought I would share some information to help you figure out what kind of water user you are, and some more information on how to be a better one.
PART ONE: Some Interesting Factoids
- Santa Monica gets more than 80% of its water from far, far away. Pumping water up and over mountains and through the desert uses 30% of the state’s electricity, much of that provided by coal-fired power plants.
- In other words, getting us water is hugely polluting.
- Getting new water from something like desalination is really, really expensive – like $16 per gallon expensive.
- Sixty to seventy per cent of single family home water use is on landscaping. Most homeowners over-water their gardens by 300%.
- Traditional sprinklers were designed for the sandiest, fastest-draining soil in the US, not for our slightly clay-like soil here in Southern CA. These sprinklers put out water three to five times faster than our soil can actually absorb it.
- Santa Monica is fined by the Environmental Protection Agency for contaminants in the Bay, 60% of which come from sprinkler overspray and runoff hitting dirty streets on its way to the storm-drain. The fine is big, and we are paying for it.
- Sprinkler overspray and runoff (from things like hosing driveways) are illegal, and can result in a $500 per day fine, accruing daily until the problem is fixed. This is different from the water waste fee, which is a fine of $250 and up.
- Most older sprinklers lose up to 40% of the water that they put out to wind and evaporation. That mist you see when your sprinklers are on is all lost water.
- The city has issued about 5,500 water violation notices in its efforts to get residents to stop watering the streets and the Bay.
- For further reference, here is a good article from Water and Wastewater News.
PART TWO: How to Read Your Water Bill (when they don’t tell you how much you should be using)
Get the bill and look at three things:
1. Usage/HCF:
An HCF is a hundred cubic feet, a 10′ x 10′ x 1′ box of water, or 748 gallons. Let’s say your bill shows that your usage is 33 HCF (the average for Santa Monica). That means you have used 33 x 748 = 24,684 gallons in this two-month billing period. That translates to 411 gallons per day, or 150,000 gallons per year.
Your toilet uses 1.6 gallons per flush. Your shower is about 2.5 – 5 gallons per minute. Your dishwasher probably uses between 7-12 gallons per cycle. Your clothes washer uses anywhere from 10-30 gallons. At that rate, it is hard to get to 411 gallons/day unless you are using it outside. Bottom line, a family of four should be using something like 125 – 150 gallons/day inside the house. Everything else is garden, leaks or waste.
2. Water Charges: Which tier are you in?
The tiers get more expensive as your usage goes up. Tier 1 is $1.65 per HCF for the first 14 HCF, Tier 2 is $2.47 per HCF for 15-40 HCF, and Tier 3 is $3.70 per HCF for 41-148 HCF. Obviously, if you are in Tier 1, you are in good shape. Tier 2 means you are moderate, and Tier 3 means you are a water hog (not to mince terms!)
3. The Graph: It is rough, yes, but it still should contain cycles due to weather. So the scale of the graph changes depending on your bill. For example, the axis on the left of mine goes up to 700 gallons per day, while friends have scales up into the thousands. What you are looking for here is steep ups and downs depending on the months. July through September should be considerably higher than November through February. If your graph is basically flat, it means that you are not adjusting your water use to the weather. Most likely, you are delivering July water to plants most of the year. If your gardener is really good, you might have a chunky up and down.
The upshot: flat = bad, spiky = good.
PART THREE: How to Improve / Lower Your Water Use
Santa Monica got a break this time due to past good behavior, i.e. the MWD rewards our previous conservation by not cutting our allocation. But if we ever go into a water-saving advisory phase, residential use will be budgeted at something like 132 HCF per year. If you are using 33 HCF per 2-month billing cycle, you are about 50% over. Rather than wait for emergency cut-backs, this is a great time for easy fixes, which will have the added benefit of achieving good marks to save the city from cuts next time.
A key easy fix is getting a weather-based irrigation controller (WBIC). That will save about 30% of your outdoor use, and won’t require re-landscaping.
WBICs look like regular irrigation controllers, but they take current weather information and adjust your system to compensate. In the summer, when it’s hot, they water more. In the winter, when it rains, they turn the system off. They will do this with no visible changes — except that the plants will be happier not being drowned.
To get a WBIC, you just need to ask your landscaper or knowledgeable gardener. I have been a guinea pig installer for the city’s landscape water folks, and the WBIC type I like best is from ETWater. These WBICs require a monthly download fee of a few dollars. You program them online, and then, if you are in Bora Bora, say, and you get a call from your neighbor that there’s a broken head, you can go online and suspend the system.
You can also go online and see when it will water next, how much rainfall there was last month, and other interesting stuff. Or the gardener can learn to control the system at the box. These are available at AquaFlo (a local irrigation supply chain) and cost about $925 or from Imperial Irrigation for $640. (For exactly the same thing.) It is sophisticated, but it is a great machine and will pay for itself over time. Besides that one, any WBIC that is approved by SWAT (Smart Water Application Technologies) should do the trick.
The second thing is to retrofit your traditional spray heads with MP Rotors. The City will rebate this. They put out water more slowly, and in a rotating arc, so the ground has time to absorb it before runoff develops. The heads go right on your existing sprinklers, and are about $4 a piece.
And if you need help with the installation of either of these devices, the City of Santa Monica has a list of landscape installers who can do the job.
There are also City of Santa Monica grants of up to $5000 if you upgrade your irrigation and remove lawn.
Finally, the reason I’m writing this is that we, the customers, have to check our own bad habits. If we have gardeners maintaining our properties, then we have to ask them to get with the program too. That means not to use the hose as a broom or expecting your gardeners to suggest that you upgrade your own irrigation system. It’s not your gardener’s job to save you water. Change has to come from customers reading the bill.
That’s my two cents.
Grace Phillips is owner of Gracescapes, a Santa Monica landscape design firm. Those outside of Santa Monica should contact their local water authorities to investigate rebates offered in their areas.
Tags: chance of rain > Emily Green > Grace Phillips > irrigation > Santa Monica > www.gracescapes.com
Is Obama’s Gain the Great Basin’s Loss?
Posted on | May 16, 2009 | 2 Comments
NOT EVERY American politician happens to be fluent in Mandarin. But Utah Governor Jon Huntsman is; he served his LDS mission in Taiwan. He is also no stranger to international industry. His father founded the Huntsman Corporation, which became a global chemical company whose products most of us know in the form of the Big Mac clamshell container. So President Obama’s choice of the Republican governor of Utah for ambassador to China is no surprise.
But regionally in rural Utah, Nevada and California, Gov Huntsman has an arguably rarer fluency — with western water. Utah’s West Desert counties running parallel to the Eastern Nevada valleys targeted by the Las Vegas pipeline plan have no more influential ally than the Mormon Governor. Those counties staunchly oppose the Las Vegas pipeline. In a tour of the West Desert last year, Gov. Huntsman told ranchers assembled in Delta, Millard County, “I want you to know my resolve. … if I’m on the wrong side of Millard County, my ancestors would be spinning in their graves … I don’t care how many people live in the West Desert, whether it’s 5, 20 or 200, we have a way of life that must be protected.”
An hour after posting the above comments, this came in from Steve Erickson of the Great Basin Water Network: “Soon to be [UT] Governor Gary Herbert ‘is prepared to fight Nevada.’ ” See story in the Salt Lake Tribune.
(For blow by blow events on the politics of the Las Vegas pipeline go to the Great Basin Water Network, the Salt Lake Tribune, the Deseret Morning News, the Las Vegas Sun, the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Southern Nevada Water Authority.)
UT Gov. Jon Huntsman meeting West Desert ranchers concerned over the impacts of the proposed Las Vegas pipeline to the Great Basin. Delta, UT, July 23, 2008
UT Gov Jon Huntsman's ancestors, whose photos hang in the Utah Territorial Statehouse in Fillmore, Millard Co, UT.
Tags: chance of rain > Emily Green > Great Basin > Huntsman > Las Vegas > pipeline > Utah
Welcome to Met, Mr. Fleming
Posted on | May 14, 2009 | No Comments
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California sent out a press release Tuesday announcing the formal seating of its newest board member, David W. Fleming, an attorney with Latham & Watkins. Among his credentials to join the board of the country’s largest water wholesaler outside of the US Bureau of Reclamation, Mr Fleming has served as (or in some instances still serves as):
- a director of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority
- chair of the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce
- chair of the Los Angeles County Business Federation
- co-chair of the Southern California Leadership Council
- chair of the Economic Alliance of the San Fernando Valley
- member and chair of the Executive Committee of the Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation
- chair of the Valley Industry & Commerce Association
- member of the Los Angeles Police Foundation
- member of the Children’s Bureau of Los Angeles
- member of the Los Angeles County Children’s Planning Council Foundation
- member of the Civic Alliance
- member of the New Majority and the Fernando Award Foundation
- vice chair of a $125 million campaign to build a new performing arts center at California State University, Northridge
- director with the California State University, Northridge Foundation
- chairman of the California Regional Leadership Foundation
- president of the Los Angeles City Board of Fire Commissioners
- member of the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission
- trustee of the James Madison Foundation
- co-chair of a voters’ initiative to reform Los Angeles city government
There is no mention of experience to do with water in this formidable resume, but Mr. Fleming’s duties will include serving on the Special Committee on the Bay-Delta. He may or may not know smelt, but he will soon be familiar with swimming upstream. That said, no track record in water is better than a bad track record. And so, Mr. Fleming, welcome and good luck.
Tags: board > chance of rain > David W. Fleming > Emily Green > Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
North American Native Plant Societies
After the lawn
Garden blogs
